The Major News Media missed revealing an advancement therapy for the anticipation of malignancy. Why? Is it since this advancement isn’t a medication yet a basic modest multivitamin with folic corrosive that can forestall malignant growths up to half? In the event that it were a drug that accomplished such surprising outcomes it would be in all the news writes about TV and papers. Is it in light of the fact that there is an inclination against nutrients and sustenance which are non-drug medicines or in light of the fact that there is no advantage for Big Pharma?
The feature in the New York Times, LA Times, and so forth and the short clip on the CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX evening news ought to have perused:
New Major Cancer Protective Treatment – A New Breakthrough ‘Medication’ That Prevents Cancers in Children –
Sadly it didn’t. I Googled this examination from the February 21, 2007, clinical diary Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics and nothing! The significant media sources in Canada conveyed it however not in the Good Ole’ USA except if you incorporate the Redding News.
“This is too straightforward a thought for individuals to treat appropriately, yet they should view it appropriately,” said Dr. Gideon Koren, overseer of the Motherisk program at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. Globe and Mail.
Nutrient Prevention Worth A Pound Of Cancer Cure
Obviously the genuine explanation this ‘advancement’ data wasn’t accounted for on in the MNM (Major News Media) was on the grounds that it was definitely not a Pharmaceutical (with significant promoting dollars on the line for MNM) however a basic modest once every day multivitamin with folic corrosive.
from Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children says.” Toronto Star
“The alarming tracking down that a modest enhancement bought at a pharmacy can forestall malignancy just as a scope of birth absconds adds weight to the hypothesis that micronutrients have long lasting medical advantages for the creating embryo.” Globe and Mail.
Unwarranted Bias Against Vitamin Supplements
Possibly the MNM didn’t get the story due to a predisposition against nutrients from alleged nutrient specialists like Rory Collins, Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology at Oxford University who was accounted for as saying. –
“It has been said that Americans have the most extravagant pee on the planet, since they devour a ton of costly nutrients and afterward pee them out…There is nothing but bad proof that any nutrient enhancements are compelling. So in the event that you will squander your cash on these dubious nutrients, you should squander less cash on the less expensive ones.” As detailed in the paper – The Independent (London), Feb 9, 2004 by Catherine Nixey.
Or on the other hand perhaps – the New York Times article (April 29, 2003) end that “multivitamins have not been appeared to forestall any sickness and that it is not difficult to arrive at sufficiently high dosages of specific nutrients and minerals to really build the danger of infection”
For if doctors and the news media can’t be trusted to get even the fundamental checkable realities directly about nutrients, for what reason should any of their suppositions be viewed appropriately? A careless glance at the logical clinical writing uncovers the bogus promulgation from these two sources.
Medication Acknowledges Vitamin Supplements-the ‘Checkable Facts’
The Journal of the American Medical Association in 2002 turned around its authentic enemy of nutrient arrangement by recognizing that “it seems judicious for all grown-ups to take nutrient enhancements”
In 1998 an Editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine was named: “Eat Right and Take a Multivitamin.”
Harvard Public Health – “Today, however, there’s acceptable proof that taking an every day multivitamin bodes well for most adults…(and) may forestall coronary illness, malignant growth, osteoporosis, and other constant infections.”
A Summary of a couple of the Positive Vitamin Studies
The Nurses’ Health Study of more than 87,000 ladies showed that the – “Long haul utilization of multivitamins may significantly lessen hazard for colon malignancy.” Annals of Internal Medicine 1998.
A 19,000 patient examination discovered Vitamin C brought down the “mortality (demise rate) from all-causes…” Lancet (2001)
A pooling of the information from a few examinations “concluded…that 1,000 IU of oral nutrient D each day is related with a half decrease in colorectal malignancy frequency.” Recent Results in Cancer Research (2007)
If one somehow managed to peruse these investigations one would reason that enhancements have a task to carry out in avoidance of sickness. Obviously if one somehow happened to overlook these investigations and additionally search for negative inappropriately done examinations one might actually show adverse outcomes by specific exploration to scaremonger, which is a typical strategy of Big Pharma, MNM and the Medical Establishment.
Nutrients Cost Savings to the System
Taking a multivitamin for in any event 11 years would save the framework $58.1 billion as detailed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science Conference on Multivitamin/Mineral Supplements and Chronic Disease Prevention. May 15-17, 2006
So there’s the essence of the matter, reserve funds of billions of dollars to the framework which would typically be shared by the Medical Establishment, Big Pharma and the Major News Media. With a near half counteraction for certain tumors, an economical multivitamin needs more benefit to go around. Presently you know why the ‘Hints of Silence Were Deafening for the Cancer Cure.’